Phase 2 · Wealth & Leverage
Social Security Breakeven Calculator
Smaller checks sooner, or bigger checks later? Set your benefit and two claiming ages to find the exact age waiting overtakes claiming early — then check it against how long you expect to live.
What age should I claim Social Security?
Claiming early permanently reduces the check; delaying past full retirement age permanently increases it by 8% a year to age 70. The break-even is where the bigger delayed checks overtake the head start of the early ones: (late × agelate − early × ageearly) ÷ (late − early). Live past it and waiting wins.
- Reductions before FRA are 5/9% per month for the first 36 months, then 5/12% per month — claiming at 62 with an FRA of 67 is a 30% permanent cut.
- Worked example (defaults on this page): a $2,000 FRA benefit pays $1,400 at 62 or $2,480 at 70 — the delayed credit adds 24%.
- Those two paths cross at age 80.4. Living to 85 collects $386,400 by claiming at 62 versus $446,400 by waiting to 70.
- Break-even is not the whole decision. Delaying also raises the survivor benefit for a spouse and hedges longevity risk, while claiming early can be right if you need income now or have reason to expect a shorter life.
Under the hood
The math, fully exposed
Each claiming age scales your full benefit, then we race the two cumulative totals:
- Waiting buys a bigger, guaranteed check: every year past FRA adds ~8% for life — a return hard to match safely, and it raises a surviving spouse's benefit too.
- Break-even is the whole question: live past it and waiting wins on total dollars; fall short and the early checks were the better call.
- Raw dollars only: no COLA or investment return here — a deliberately clean lens. If you'd invest early checks, your personal break-even drifts later.
Your directives
What to do next, based on your numbers
Adjust the sliders to generate tailored recommendations.
Answers